Performance analysis of multiuser diversity scheduling schemes in FSO communication sys-tem
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

1. State Key Laboratory of Integrated Service Networks, School of Telecommunications Engineering, XidianUniversity, Xi’an 710071, China;2. State Grid Nantong Power Supply Company, Nantong 226000, China;3. School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, XidianUniversity, Xi’an 710071, China

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [16]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Taking into consideration theaperture averaging,the system performance of a point-to-multipoint free space optical (FSO) system for various multiuser diversity scheduling schemes is studied over exponentiated Weibull (EW) fading channels. The selection principles of greedy scheduling (GS), selective multiuser diversity scheduling (SMDS), proportional fair scheduling (PFS) and selective multiuser diversity scheduling with exponential rule (SMDS-ER) schemes are introduced and compared on the basis of time-varying behavior of turbulence channel fadingin the present system. The analytical average capacity expressions for the GS and SMDS schemes are derived, respectively. Then, the relative capacity simulations for PFS and SMDS-ER schemes are also provided over EW fading channels with the binary phase shift keying (BPSK) modulation. The results show thatthe GS scheme obtains the maximum average capacity at the cost of the fairness of users. The SMDS-ER receives the minimum capacity, but it guarantees the fairness of users. The SMDS and PFS schemes can get balance between capacity and fairness. This study can be used for FSO system design.

    Reference
    [1]M. T. Dabiri and S. M. S. Sadough, IEEE Communications Letters 21, 2170 (2017).
    [2]J. Libich, J. Perez, S. Zvanovec, Z. Ghassemlooy, R. Nebuloni and C. Capsoni, Applied Optics 56, 336 (2017).
    [3]K. Wang, A. Nirmalathas, C. Lim, K. Alameh and E. Skafidas, Journal of Optical Communications and Networking 9, A189 (2017).
    [4]X. Liu, P. Wang and T. Cao, Optoelectronics Letters 12, 366 (2016).
    [5]H. Fu, P. Wang, R. Wang, X. Liu, L. Guo and Y. Yang, Optoelectronics Letters 12, 294 (2016).
    [6]R. Barrios and F. Dios, Optics Express 20, 13055 (2012).
    [7]R. Barrios and F. Dios, Optics Laser Technology 45, 13 (2013).
    [8]P. Wang, N. Xiang, Q. Gao, R. Wang, L. Guo and Y. Yang, IEEE Photonics Journal 8, 7902415 (2016).
    [9]J. Abouei and K. N. Plataniotis, Journal of Lightwave Technology 30, 1351 (2012).
    [10]I. B. Djordjevic, Journal of Optical Communications and Networking 2, 221 (2010).
    [11]A. Eslami, S. Vangala and H. Pishro-Nik, IEEE Transactions on Communications58, 2926 (2010).
    [12]I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series and Products, Amsterdam, The Netherlands:Elsevier, 2007.
    [13]D. Gesbert and M.-S. Alouini, How Much Feedback is Multi-User Diversity Really Worth? IEEE International Conference on Communications, 234 (2004).
    [14]P. Viswanath, D. N. C. Tse and R. Laroia, IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory 48, 1277 (2002).
    [15]M. O. Sunay and A. Eksim, Wireless Multicast with Multi-User Diversity, IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference,
    1584 (2004).
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

LIU Tao, ZHANG Hai-lin, FU Hui-hua, WANG Ping, and XIANG Nan. Performance analysis of multiuser diversity scheduling schemes in FSO communication sys-tem[J]. Optoelectronics Letters,2018,14(4):296-300

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:1253
  • PDF: 0
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:December 29,2017
  • Revised:March 20,2018
  • Online: July 26,2018
Article QR Code