Enhanced efficiency and brightness in organic light- emitting devices with MoO3 as hole-injection layer
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

College of Physics and Information Engineering, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, China

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [18]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The organic light-emitting devices (OLEDs) using 4,4’,4’’-tris{N-(3-methylphenyl)-N-phenylamin}triphenylamine (m-MTDATA) and MoO3 or 1,3,5-triazo-2,4,6-triphosphorine-2,2,4,4,6,6-tetrachloride (TAPC) and MoO3 as the hole-injection layer (HIL) were fabricated. MoO3 can be expected to be a good injection layer material and thus enhance the emission performance of OLED. The highest occupied molecular (HOMO) of MoO3 is between those of m-MTDATA or TAPC and N,N’-bis-(1-naphthyl)-N,N’-diphenyl-1,1’-biphenyl-4,4’-diamine (NPB), which reduces the hole-injection barrier and improves the luminance of the OLEDs. The current efficiency is improved compared with that of the device without the MoO3 layer. The highest luminous efficiency of the device with 2-nm-thick MoO3 as HIL is achieved as 5.27 cd/A at 10 V, which is nearly 1.2 times larger than that of the device without it. Moreover, the highest current efficiency and power efficiency of the device with the structure indium-tin oxide (ITO)/TAPC (40 nm)/MoO3 (2 nm)/TcTa:Ir(ppy)3 (10%, 10 nm)/ tris-(8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminium (Alq) (60 nm)/LiF (1 nm)/Al are achieved as 37.15 cd/A and 41.23 lm/W at 3.2 V and 2.8 V, respectively.

    Reference
    [1] Jabbour G. E., Kippelen B., Armstrong N. R. and Peyghambarian N., Applied Physics Letters 73, 1185 (1998).
    [2] Kido J. and Matsumoto T., Applied Physics Letters 73, 2866 (1998).
    [3] Benor A., Takizawa S. Y., Perez-Bolivar C. and Anzenbacher P., Applied Physics Letters 96, 243310 (2010).
    [4] Hung L. S., Tang C. W. and Mason M. G., Applied Physics Letters 70, 152 (1997).
    [5] Qiu C. F., Wang L. D., Chen H. Y., Wong M. and Kwok H. S., Applied Physics Letters 79, 2276 (2001).
    [6] Qiu Y., Gao Y. D., Wei P. and Wang L. D., Applied Physics Letters 80, 2628 (2002).
    [7] F. Li, H. Tang, J. Anderegg and J. Shinar, Applied Physics Letters 70, 1233 (1997).
    [8] Hu W., Manabe K., Furukawa T. and Matsumura M., Applied Physics Letters 80, 2640 (2002).
    [9] Guohua Xie, Zhensong Zhang, Qin Xue, Shiming Zhang, Li Zhao, Yang Luo, Ping Chen, Baofu Quan, Yi Zhao and Shiyong Liu, Organic Electronics 11, 2055 (2010).
    [10] Xuemei Wen, Yongming Yin, Yang Li, Shihao Liu, Letian Zhang, Nana Ma, Guogang Shan and Wenfa Xie, Organic Electronics 15, 675 (2014).
    [11] Chao Cai, Shi-Jian Su, Takayuki Chiba, Hisahiro Sasabe, Yong-Jin Pu, Kenichi Nakayama and Junji Kido, Organic Electronics 12, 843 (2011).
    [12] Jin Won Sun, Jeong-Hwan Lee, Chang-Ki Moon, Kwon-Hyeon Kim, Hyun Shin and Jang-Joo Kim, Advanced Materials 26, 5684 (2014).
    [13] Hu W. and Matsumura M., Applied Physics Letters 81, 806 (2002).
    [14] Chan I. M., Hsu T. Y. and Hong E. C., Applied Physics Letters 81, 1899 (2002).
    [15] Xuemei Wen, Yongming Yin, Yang Li, Shihao Liu, Letian Zhang, Nana Ma, Guogang Shan and Wenfa Xie, Organic Electronics 15, 675 (2014).
    [16] Yue-Feng Liu, Jing Feng,Yi-Fan Zhang, Hai-Feng Cui, Da Yin, Yan-Gang Bi, Jun-Feng Song, Qi-Dai Chen and Hong-Bo Sun, Organic Electronics 15, 478 (2014).
    [17] YANG Hui-shan, WU Li-shuang, WU Jin-mei and WU Zhi-wei, Journal of Optoelectronics.Laser 26, 1273 (2015). (in Chinese)
    [18] WANG Rui-xue, FAN Chang-jun and YANG Xiao-Hui, Journal of Optoelectronics.Laser 26, 649 (2015). (in Chinese)
    Cited by
Get Citation

YANG Hui-shan, WU Li-shuang. Enhanced efficiency and brightness in organic light- emitting devices with MoO3 as hole-injection layer[J]. Optoelectronics Letters,2017,13(1):29-32

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:3865
  • PDF: 0
  • HTML: 0
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:October 03,2016
  • Revised:November 13,2016
  • Online: January 11,2017
Article QR Code